Professional
shitposting:
when a brand can actually joke.
This isn't a project I built. It's a topic I fell into, kept reading about, and now keep a folder of screenshots for. A short field note on what professional shitposting actually is, the brands that make it look easy, and why nine out of ten attempts age like warm milk.
One screenshot, then
a folder, then a habit.
I didn't plan to fall into this. It started with a Wendy's roast thread late one night, then a Duolingo TikTok someone sent me, then a folder on my desktop quietly turning into a hundred-plus posts, ads, and replies. At some point I noticed I wasn't just laughing — I was studying. Comparing brands. Mentally cutting the lines that didn't work. Trying to work out why one post lands and the next one sounds like a manager wrote it after a workshop.
So this page isn't a case study. It's the thing I'd write if a friend asked, "why is this funny when this other one isn't?" Professional shitposting, as far as I can tell, is not random chaos with a logo on it. It's controlled looseness. Tasteful mischief. A brand speaking internet without sounding like it's begging the algorithm for a hug. The brands that pull it off don't really do memes. They have a voice that happens to survive the format.
If it needs a deck to explain
why it's funny, it's already
dead.
Notes &
colophon.
- Type
- Reading note / personal observation, not commissioned work
- Focus
- Internet-native brand voice — what works, what doesn't
- Studied
- Wendy's, Duolingo, Ryanair, Aldi UK, Surreal, Liquid Death, Innocent, Steak-umm
- Why here
- It's a taste signal. Portfolios usually hide these.
- Tools
- Screenshots folder, Notes, time
- Bias
- I genuinely find this stuff funny and probably overweight it